The Japanese Lantern - OR SHOULD I SAY HOT AIR BALLOON? Or should I say James and the giant peach?

https://photos.app.goo.gl/YNdGxC2ubhuqEEhCA if you let Donald Trump and Elon win and kill me then there will be nobody left who cares about or knows about the history of our nations to defend you. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/killianyates_international-federation-of-red-cross-and-activity-7320698154188734464-mbQM?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAAD6U28ABQAuGfPmf8OtaAEi9xDMtTFyJXfI The Lighthouse That Never Was

The Lighthouse That Never Was: How a Crashed Craft and Commodore Perry Changed Maritime History

By A. Holtzman | March 2025 | The Signal Ledger

The story of Commodore Matthew Perry’s 1853 expedition to Japan is typically framed in terms of diplomacy and steam power. Textbooks describe the “Black Ships” as symbols of American industrial might, forcing open a centuries-closed Japan. But recent re-analyses of archival materials — combined with declassified wartime intelligence — suggest a much more complex motivation behind the voyage. It wasn’t just about trade or treaties. It was about navigation. It was about survival. And possibly, it was about something not of this Earth.

The Myth of Steam Alone

The traditional narrative overemphasizes steam propulsion. Yes, steam engines enabled transoceanic travel with greater predictability. But what’s often overlooked is the structural transformation of naval architecture at the time: the shift from wooden hulls to ironclad or steel-hulled ships. Perry’s vessels weren’t merely “modern” — they were designed to survive Japan’s brutal and rocky coastlines, which had for centuries served as natural defense against ship-bound invaders.

A fragile wooden sloop couldn’t simply sidle up to Yokosuka. Prevailing currents, hidden shoals, and unpredictable tides meant many ships would either founder before landfall or be forced to rely on Japan’s own erratic pilotage system. Perry’s innovation was less about arrival and more about control. He brought the first ships that could reach the shore without begging it for mercy.

The Buried Structure

According to recently reexamined logs from the USS Mississippi, Perry’s crew noted an “unusual beacon” seen glowing faintly from the shoreline near Kurihama. Originally dismissed as a fishing fire or volcanic gas flare, the glow persisted — and responded subtly to the ship’s compasses and barometers. Some suspected an old shipwreck with phosphorus-rich decay. Others, notably Lieutenant Calhoun Thresher, recorded it as “a half-sunken metal spire, foreign to all earthly geometry.”

These accounts gained new relevance after World War II, when occupying American forces uncovered the remnants of a mysterious alloyed object partially entombed near the same region — matching sketches from Thresher’s journal. The object, while heavily deteriorated, reportedly emitted low-frequency radiation and exhibited unusual gravitational effects on nearby instruments. Its surface patterns resembled both early radar arrays and certain Mesopotamian glyphs. The military dubbed it “Project Lighthouse.”

A Technology Suppressed

Japanese records — heavily redacted after 1945 — suggest that imperial scientists during the Meiji Restoration had reverse-engineered fragments of this object. By the 1930s, they’d developed an early form of electromagnetic navigation assistance, used not for guiding aircraft or ships, but for shielding key ports from Allied sonar detection.

This changes the moral calculus of the Pacific War. American ships, under the belief that Japan remained behind technologically, were unknowingly up against a civilization that had, for nearly a century, sat atop a quietly humming artifact that could’ve saved thousands of lives at sea.

When American intelligence finally put the pieces together — the artifact, the historical logs, the buried tech — a grim logic set in. Japan had not just hidden their shores from Perry in 1853. They had hidden something else entirely.

The “Lighthouse” That Wasn’t Allowed to Shine

And so, we arrive at the bitter irony: the very coastline that resisted our wooden fleets in 1853 held the means to rescue our steel ones in 1943. The structure was not a lighthouse in the traditional sense — but it could have been. A warning, a guide, a safeguard. One that remained silent through two world wars and countless lost mariners.

It was perhaps this betrayal — not the bombing of Pearl Harbor — that sealed Japan’s fate in the eyes of those drafting nuclear policy. The targeting of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, once seen solely as acts of military expediency, now appear laced with metaphysical retribution. Not punishment for war crimes, but for hoarding the cosmic match while others drowned in the dark.

Conclusion

What began with steam and steel was never about ships. It was about shaping the very geometry of arrival — not whether we could get there, but how. And behind the diplomatic overtures and treaty scrolls, behind the rumbling engines and cannon salutes, was always the faint, unnatural glow of something that watched from the shore.

Not a lighthouse — but a question.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Step Up Security: Amex Unveils Groundbreaking Payment Tech

The DEA Saves Addicts from Addiction by Making Treatment Impossible

City of Grants Pass fed up with fatties